Human Folly about “Uncle-Bob”

index

• Cleancodeqa (github.com):

  further debate between #Muratori and #Uncle-Bob about #Clean-Code, elaborating an OS I/O device example in a very illuminating way

  on 02026-04-10
• Cleancodeqa (github.com):

  discussion between #Muratori and #Uncle-Bob about #Clean-Code, significantly but not completely focused on #performance, discussing Muratori’s video criticizing it.

  on 02026-04-10
• The clean code debacle and rhetoric tricks Casey (old.reddit.com):

  #Muratori harshly criticizing #Uncle-Bob’s version of #clean-code as a “debacle”, and "gingerBill", the guy who wrote #Odin, reviewed his criticism, adding criticism of his own. gingerBill’s video commentary is mostly just low-content snarky innuendo.

  Many commenters agree with Muratori: “I would not recommend Clean Code even to beginners, it’s an awful book. Here is the thing: if you just skim it and read the headlines then any sane person would agree. But if you just want to skim it, then you are not the target audience of CC. The issue is when it comes to actually implementing the suggestions. Martin’s examples make the code even worse than it was before.”

  on 02026-04-10
• Aposd vs clean code (github.com):

  debate between #Ousterhout and #Uncle-Bob utterly demolishing “#Clean-Code”.

  on 02026-04-10
• Clean (qntm.org):

  “It's probably time to stop recommending #Clean-Code” because the author doesn’t like the code. #Uncle-Bob

  on 02021-05-29
• Uncle Bob (hillelwayne.com):

  #Hillel-Wayne on #Uncle-Bob (Robert Martin, Robert C. Martin) promoting ignorance

  on 02019-01-22