detailed #performance comparison of #Kafka and #RabbitMQ (and #Redis)
on 02017-06-18another comparison of #0MQ vs. #nanomsg and other things including #Kafka and #RabbitMQ and even #Redis
on 02017-06-18#Kafka is “less like a queue system and more like a circular buffer that scales as much as your disk on your cluster” and “doesn’t have message acknowledgements, it assumes the consumer tracks of what’s been consumed so far”, while #RabbitMQ “is broker-centric, focused around delivery guarantees between producers and consumers, with transient preferred over durable messages;” while Kafka handles 10+ million messages per second at LinkedIn, RabbitMQ struggles to exceed 1 million.
on 02017-06-18Auth0 Webtasks (?) switched their log aggregation from #Kafka to #0MQ; apparently Kafka is much faster than #RabbitMQ
on 02017-06-18Pieter Hintjens describes what kind of #performance you should expect from an AMQP broker like #RabbitMQ or from #0MQ and why. #Performance of RabbitMQ is about 60× worse than #0MQ by default and 4× faster than Apache Qpid, but that’s if you have persistence turned on in RabbitMQ.
on 02017-06-16