I resampled "ha" and the 1860 recording to some common frequency, which was pretty low, a few hundred Hz. "siffl" has a strong peak at 2691Hz. I don't know if I should try to resample it down to the same frequency, but I suspect so. "mo" peaks at 548Hz. "nie" has several formants in evidence. The strongest peak is at 370Hz late in the signal, coming down from 405Hz early in the signal. The overall peak is at 390Hz. The fundamental may be 174Hz. "ha"'s strongest peak is at 313Hz, but that seems to be an overtone of a weaker fundamental at 153Hz. The resampled Scott 1860 recording has a strong fundamental at 158Hz or 159Hz. If I figure that the frequency I'm shooting for is 156Hz, then I want to resample siffl, mo, and nie by using sampling rates of 2557 sps, 12554 sps, and 39537sps, respectively. nie done in Audacity, now to export. Exported, now I can't hear it. Dammit. mo: done. I think rather than resampling siffl all the way down, I'll stick with two octaves above the other sounds. That puts me at 4*2557 = 10228 sps.